Colgate
University says, “Sell us your Greek houses or we’ll eliminate
you. Go underground,
and you may be suspended or expelled.”
This is the edict from this small liberal college to the
fraternities and sororities in the village of Hamilton, New York.
Colgate’s
coercive land-grab scheme of prime real estate started about 18
months. The
“Residential Education Vision” mandated that all students live
in university-owned housing.
Private fraternities –and later, sororities - have been
an integral part of the campus for 149 years.
President
Rebecca Chopp and Chairman John Golden boast that Colgate will
create and implement the first comprehensive four-year residential
program in the country. The
administration argues that only by owning the prime real estate of
eleven Greek houses can they ensure the “safety and personal
growth of students on a par with what is found in university
housing.” Dean Adam
Weinberg sees it as a mission to capture “educational
moments.”
To
alumni involved with Students & Alumni for Colgate, Inc. (www.sa4c.com)
or the student-led FACT (Freedom of Association Coalition for
Truth
www.colgate-fact.org),
Colgate’s heavy-handed tactics are nothing more than extortion,
a “progressive” attempt at social engineering, and the next
step to eliminating Greek life at Colgate.
Greek
alumni leaders have spent more than a year trying to negotiate
with the school. They
offered long-term leases, immediate and unquestioned access to the
houses by university personnel, in-house residential advisors, and
required residential education training for the Greek-letter
undergraduates.
At
every turn, their efforts were rebuffed.
It was “my way or the highway.” The school consistently
reiterated their threat that any private property owned by
fraternities or sororities that had not been sold to the
University would loose their recognition and that any student who
“participated” in an unapproved organization would be subject
to suspension or expulsion.
The
Trustees passed two resolutions to this effect, and there were
numerous documents from the administration expounding the edict.
By
the end of April 2005, believing they had no alternative, the
alumni of five fraternities and two sororities had voted to sell
or gift their house to the school.
Another fraternity lost their long-term lease to the
school. Two other
fraternities are still negotiating.
Importantly,
the national leadership of Phi Delta Theta campaigned against
the sale citing the fact that in other instances around the
country where Greek houses had been sold to a University, the
alumni members loose interest, and the chapter is weakened.
In some instances, the fraternity eventually disbands.
Several
of the fraternities at Colgate are holding off on conveying the
title of their property because of a lawsuit filed by Delta Kappa
Epsilon. The general
causes of complaint relate to Colgate University’s violation of
federal anti-trust law by creating a monopoly on housing in
Hamilton and environs. Despite
a denial for a temporary restraining order and preliminary
injunction, the case is moving forward.
Colgate, in its response to an amended DKE complaint,
opened the line of inquiry for discovery far beyond their stated
goal of owning the houses to ensure the “safety and personal
growth” of students.
Ironically,
official crime incidence reports for 2001-2003 show that liquor
violations and drug violations for on-campus property versus
non-campus property were 1,328 to 5 and 443 to 3, respectively.
Fortunately, forcible sex offences and illegal weapon
possessions were in the single digits, but even here, on-campus
property versus non-campus property reported 7 to 2 and 9 to 0.
It’s safer to live in a private fraternity or sorority
than in Colgate-owned housing!
Half
of Colgate alumni and more than one-third of the student body are
members of Greek-letter organizations.
The grade point average of the Greek cohort at Colgate is
as high or higher than the rest of the student body.
Each House points with pride to the community service hours
volunteered by their members.
Students
living in privately owned fraternities and sororities are
responsible to manage their residential property, hire staff for
food preparation, create, fund and account for a budget for house
social activities, and sustain an atmosphere of trust, fellowship
and integrity.
Curiously,
this is exactly the objective of Colgate’s residential vision
– except that the administration insists on owning all the
properties (a predictable revenue stream and cheap source of new
housing), and requires all students to submit for approval a plan
of how their house will operate, and the difference they will make
to the community. Students
are directed to make a proposal for a social event to a
“community council.” If
the plan is approved, they may receive some funds from the school
for a chaperoned party.
The
idea of “theme houses” is not new to Colgate.
Upperclassman can already apply to live in Balkanized
housing: Black students are encouraged to live in the Harlem
Renaissance Center, Asian students at the Asia Interest House,
“peace studies” students at the Bunche House, homosexual
students at the Class of 1934 House, “environmental activists”
at The Loj. Other
houses seek to attract students who want to live in a
substance-free environment; those involved in the creative arts,
or in a “democracy experience” for sophomore men.
There are specific meeting houses for Latino students and
Jewish students.
Colgate
University is being re-made into a niched prep school, where
diversity is measured by skin color and sexual preference;
intellectual diversity is discouraged. In fact, the school seeks
to attract “more angular” (less well-rounded) students, as
articulated by a faculty member.
The
effort to eliminate Greek life at Colgate has simmered for many
years, fueled by a tenured, militant faculty who see their job as
molding young minds to their worldview.
Faculty
members have voted twice to eliminate Greek life at Colgate:
once in 1989 by a vote of 134 to 37, and again in 2001, by
a vote of 140 to 40. Greek
life represents an area of diversity not controlled by the
administration or faculty and its presence is contemptuously
tolerated.
This
is perplexing when one considers that the primary customers for a
university are its students.
But, the faculty members are terribly out of synch with
their constituents. Only
five teachers of approximately 250 at Colgate are self-described
traditionalists, or conservatives. (Victoria Fontan, a visiting
professor who teaches a required CORE class, brags of her ties to
Hezbollah and the wife of terrorist Al Zarqawi!)
In
an on-line poll taken by The Colgate Maroon News 12/19/04,
students reported that Colgate
is: 22% Too
Conservative; 59% Too Liberal; 19% My Atlantis (refers
to being a good fit for one's personal political views.)
When 59% of those who responded say the school is too
liberal, what does that say about the academic and social
culture at Colgate?
Colgate
University prides itself on a rigorous academic program.
Indeed, the average SAT score for the 2007 class is 1378.
These are not slouch students.
Clearly, they are responsible, focused and
self-disciplined. Yet,
the administration’s priority is to make students feel good
about their role in the world.
In
an administration document entitled “The New Liberal Arts
Curriculum,” President Rebecca Chopp (who received a doctorate
degree in feminist theology) lays out a vision for a required
“…core curriculum responsive to…the changing
interests and needs of students. Each of the components of the
core program is designed to address questions of identity,
culture, and knowledge. These courses enable students to address
the question of ‘who am I?’”
Admirable
as it may be that students will graduate from Colgate knowing who
they are, the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (www.goacta.org),
a non-partisan, non-profit organization that analyzes core
curriculum in major colleges and universities across the country,
gave Colgate an “F” grade for its core curriculum.
Incredibly,
a student can make it through four years without taking a writing
or composition class, no math class that involves numbers, natural
sciences requirements satisfied with classes in psychology,
physical science classes satisfied by an entire course on AIDS or
another specific disease, no American history, no literature, no
economics.
F.A.C.T.
– Freedom of Association Coalition for Truth (colgate-fact.org)
is a student-led organization (not approved by the university).
FACT organized a student protest rally on April 12, 2005
with more than 350 students attending.
Featured speakers included FACT president Sean Devlin,
‘05 DKE, David Horowitz (www.frontpagemag.com),
David French, president of the Foundation of Individual Rights in
Education (www.thefire.org)
and other Colgate alumni and students.
After the rally speeches, the students marched to
president’s office where they gave a list of 13 demands and a
petition with signatures of 1,200 (of approx. 2,800 enrolled)
students to Rebecca Chopp. She
was alternatively patronizing and uncomfortable.
The
event received national news coverage from all the major broadcast
and cable television media, local newspaper coverage, and Internet
weblogs. Colgate’s
answer to the demands has been to stall and mumble the same
propaganda on “safety and personal growth.”
The
stealth campaign to eliminate fraternities and sororities is
symptomatic of the crisis in academia across America.
Political diversity, intellectual diversity, and tolerance
for traditions such as Greek life must be defended and protected.
Colgate University is the latest battleground.